Navigating Oil Investments During Geopolitical Turmoil: Why Midstream Stocks Like Energy Transfer Stand Out

When geopolitical tensions escalate, oil markets often react sharply. In recent months, Brent crude soared over 70% to exceed $100 per barrel after U.S. and Israeli airstrikes on Iran disrupted shipments through the Strait of Hormuz. Many investors rushed into oil stocks, but not all are built to withstand the volatility. This Q&A explores the smartest way to play the oil sector during uncertainty, focusing on the resilient midstream model and one standout pick: Energy Transfer (NYSE: ET).

Why Did Oil Prices Surge Beyond $100 This Year?

Brent crude experienced an extraordinary rally, climbing more than 70% to top $100 per barrel. The primary catalyst was the escalation of conflict after the U.S. and Israel launched airstrikes against Iran in late February. This military action triggered a broader regional conflict that directly threatened the Strait of Hormuz—a narrow waterway through which roughly 20% of the world's oil passes. As shipping lanes were curtailed and military tensions mounted, supply fears drove prices sharply upward. The combination of actual supply disruptions and heightened speculation pushed crude to levels not seen in years. Investors quickly shifted capital into energy equities, but the sustainability of these gains depends on whether the conflict persists or de-escalates.

Are All Oil Stocks Equally Risky During Geopolitical Crises?

No, the oil sector is not monolithic. Upstream companies (exploration and production) and downstream refiners are highly sensitive to fluctuating crude prices. When conflict erupts, their revenues can spike, but they are equally vulnerable to a sudden price collapse once tensions ease. In contrast, midstream companies—which transport, store, and process oil and natural gas—operate on fee-based contracts. Their income depends more on volume than on commodity prices. This structural buffer makes them far less exposed to the boom-and-bust cycles driven by geopolitical headlines. For long-term investors seeking stability, midstream stocks offer a way to participate in energy markets without betting on the direction of crude.

What Makes Midstream Stocks More Resilient Than Upstream or Downstream?

Midstream firms like Energy Transfer earn the majority of their revenue through long-term, fee-based agreements. Whether oil is at $50 or $100 per barrel, their pipelines, terminals, and storage facilities keep moving product. This business model provides predictable cash flows and shields them from the price volatility that rattles upstream drillers and downstream refineries. Additionally, midstream assets often operate as essential infrastructure—think of them as the “toll roads” of the energy system. Even during geopolitical uncertainty, demand for transportation and storage remains steady. As a result, these stocks tend to hold value better and offer more consistent dividends, making them a safer haven when markets are jittery over events like the Strait of Hormuz blockade.

Why Is Energy Transfer Specifically a Top Midstream Pick?

Energy Transfer (NYSE: ET) stands out among midstream peers for several reasons. It owns a massive, diversified network of pipelines, natural gas liquids (NGL) fractionators, and export terminals across the United States. Its fee-based contract structure covers over 85% of its EBITDA, insulating it from commodity price swings. The company also generates strong free cash flow, which supports a high-yield distribution—currently attractive for income-focused investors. Moreover, Energy Transfer has growth projects in its backlog, including expansions tied to NGL exports, which can thrive even amid global turmoil. By investing in Energy Transfer, shareholders gain exposure to essential energy infrastructure that keeps earning regardless of whether the conflict in the Middle East intensifies or fades.

How Does the Strait of Hormuz Disruption Affect Oil Supply and Demand?

The Strait of Hormuz is a critical chokepoint: about 20 million barrels of oil pass through daily—roughly one-fifth of global consumption. When airstrikes and regional fighting curbed shipments, the immediate impact was a reduction in available supply. Traders priced in not only the current shortfall but also the fear of a complete closure, which would cripple exports from Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Kuwait, and the UAE. This supply shock sent Brent crude surging. However, midstream companies like Energy Transfer are largely unaffected because their assets are located in the U.S., far from the conflict. Their volume-based earnings remain stable as domestic production continues. In fact, higher U.S. output to compensate for global shortages can actually boost throughput on their pipelines.

Should Short-Term Traders or Long-Term Investors Focus on Midstream?

While traders may chase the hot upstream stocks that spike during a crisis, long-term investors are better off with midstream’s steady returns. Upstream companies can double in weeks but crash just as fast if peace talks emerge. Midstream equities, by contrast, provide a compounding income stream through distributions and share repurchases. They also tend to have lower beta, meaning they are less volatile than the broader energy sector. For those with a horizon of three to five years or more, Energy Transfer’s infrastructure assets, fee-based revenue, and growth potential offer a compelling risk-adjusted return. The lesson is clear: during geopolitical uncertainty, don't bet on price direction—invest in the infrastructure that keeps the world running no matter what.

Back to top: Why Did Oil Prices Surge? | Learn more about Energy Transfer